Friday, September 15, 2006

E.O. 558 Is For The "Non-Bankable" Poor

Last week, the entire Philippine banking and finance community were caught by surprise over the President’s signing of E.O. 558. The said Order repealed the Estrada-era E.O. 138 which prohibited government non-financial agencies (GNFAs) like DSWD from engaging in microfinancing. Even high ranking officials from the Department of Finance (DOF) and Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) were puzzled at the President’s seemingly “irrational” and “rash” order and most of the key leaders in the credit financing sector have already come out to express their concern and alarm even, over the junking of E.O. 138. Some commentators like Billy Esposo even claimed that E.O. 558 will be used for politicking in next year's elections. Judging from their reactions, it now seems clear that Malacañang acted "unilaterally" and did not consult finance and banking officials before issuing the E.O. (or probably someone in Malacañang knew that these people would naturally oppose the move and just decided to go on with it). BSP Governor Amando Tetangco “worded” this widespread cynicism the best when he said: “with E.O. 558, the country would risk losing its hard-won fiscal discipline that has dramatically improved international perception of the Philippines… The government could best preserve and enlarge its gains in microfinance lending by maintaining a policy environment that would encourage private financial institutions to invest in serving the bankable poor.”

The question to Mr. Tetangco then is: “what about the non-bankable poor" (di ba parang oxymoron). Aren't they entitled to loans too? (By the way, I would be very interested to hear from him the difference between the "bankable" and "non-bankable" poor).

I remember that when Arroyo first assumed the Presidency, she cited “SME Development” as one of her key programs to create more jobs and bring about economic growth for Filipinos. In 2003, she launched “SULONG” (which stands for “SME Unified Lending Opportunities for National Growth” – quite a mouthful). SULONG is an amalgamation of 7 government financial institutions or GFIs (DBP, LBP, National Livelihood Support Fund, PhilExim, Quedancor, SSS and Small Business Corporation) which signed a covenant to implement an “integrated approach” to SME lending. And after only three years in operation, current DTI Secretary Peter Favila reports that over P85 billion in loans have already been released to various SMEs nationwide under the SULONG program. Theoretically, since there are about 800,000 SMEs in the country according to NSO data, this means that each SME can borrow about P105,000 under the SULONG program. Note that besides SULONG, there are many other GFIs and private sector groups also engaged in microfinancing. Fueled by Overseas Development Assistance (ODA) loans and local savings, the perception is there is much money to be lent out to SMEs in the Philippines today.

This perception seems to be bolstered by the fact that only a week ago, a friend of mine whose family owns a small rural bank in Dipolog City, Zamboanga del Norte said that their bank is currently “awash with microfinancing cash” (courtesy of PCFC – People’s Credit and Financing Corporation). He also said that their primary problem now is the lack of qualified borrowers; most of the small businesses in their area lack the necessary documents to qualify for a loan. He further notes that SME owners are “opaque” (as opposed to transparent) and it is very hard for his credit investigators to examine their credit standing because they do not usually keep a record of their business transactions.

Businessmen oftentimes lament the fact that Philippine banks are very strict and quite conservative in their lending habits. They say banks will only lend you money if you can prove to them that you don't need them. Banks, especially the big ones, perceive SMEs as "high credit risks" and disdainfully view SME lending as "too much work for too little gain." According to a study made by Fajardo in 1990, the median age of SMEs in the Philippines is 7 years. A study made by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China also made a similar finding: "around 50% of SMEs come to an end in their first three years of business and 50% of the remaining 50% disappear in the next 5 years." In other words, only 25% of start-up SMEs remain after only 8 years in business and very few small businesses survive to be more than 10 years old. Various banking industry studies also show that microfinancing is at least 5 times more costly than say, commercial loans. This is so because you need to hire more people to manage larger volumes of accounts but at "tingi-tingi" amounts. We Ilonggos have a word for it: "pabugas-bugas."

Despite government's efforts to provide credit access to the poor, there are still many who fail to qualify for start-up business loans. For one, most GFIs require collateral and "equity capital" - meaning a borrower should also have counterpart money for his start-up business - to qualify for a loan. But who has capital nowadays? Certainly not the poor itinerant vendor. Also, most Filipinos are "afraid" of going inside a bank: first, you have to look "presentable" (i.e. indi naka-tsinelas, sando) or else the loan officer would think you do not have "capacity to pay," second, loan processing demands paperwork and usually takes at least a month and third, it is more convenient to borrow from the friendly neighborhood "5-6" (ikaw pa ang pinupuntahan para pautangin!).

I think that the underlying reasons/motivations for President Arroyo's repeal of E.O. 138 can be attributed to the fact that GFIs have not been entirely successful in "weaning away" Filipino entrepreneurs from the "5-6." She therefore wants the line agencies (like DSWD) to come in and provide credit to the "non-bankable poor," to borrow Tetangco's term. While it has restored the faith of the international community, the prudential measures being observed by GFIs and MFIs (Micro Financing Institutions) have caused a "bottleneck" in SME financing. Thus, as my friend the rural banker said, they are "awash with microfinancing cash but little qualified borrowers." I surmise that the President (or whoever her E.O. 138 adviser is) felt that not enough funds are reaching the poor or if loans are do released by GFIs/MFIs, the microfinancing funds most often reach not the poor itinerant vendor but the middle-class entrepreneur. Interestingly, just weeks before the President signed E.O. 558 Malacañang and NEDA have issued press statements urging our financial sector to be more "developmental," and "not be lazy" in lending to SMEs. So I guess the President got "impatient" with the "excuses" and prudential guidelines of our GFIs/MFIs and decided to just proceed with taking on the "5-6" on her own.

For not sufficiently explaining and defending the rationale for E.O. 558 in media, Malacañang is losing the policy debate over the issue. I think Palace PR hacks should perform better at explaining the President's new policy directive to our people.


Econblogger said...


Your championing of the SME sector is commendable. However repeal of EO 138 has its dark side - the throwback to the inefficient era of direct credit programs.

It is a dilemma, true: observe sound credit principles, and a lot of small borrowers get excluded; serve every borrower, and get a lot of money flushed down the toilet. I believe that sustainable finance for the poor is gradually increasing; the easiest way to nip it in the bud is to subject it to unfair competition from cheap credit-cum-grants from the government.

Mrs Sharon Sim said...

Hello Everybody,
My name is Mrs Sharon Sim. I live in singapore and i am a happy woman today? and i told my self that any lender that rescue my family from our poor situation, i will refer any person that is looking for loan to him, he gave me happiness to me and my family, i was in need of a loan of S$250,000.00 to start my life all over as i am a single mother with 3 kids I met this honest and GOD fearing man loan lender that help me with a loan of S$250,000.00 SG. Dollar, he is a GOD fearing man, if you are in need of loan and you will pay back the loan please contact him tell him that is Mrs Sharon, that refer you to him. contact Dr Purva Pius,via email:( you

Benson moore said...

Do you need Loan to pay off your debt and start a new life? You have come to the right place were you can get FUNDED at a very low interest rate. Interested people/company should please contact us via email for more details.

Full name:
Date of birth (yyyy-mm-dd):
Marital status:
Amount Needed:
Zip/postal code:
Phone number:
Monthly Income:


Mrs.Irene Query said...

How I Got My Loan From A Genuine And Reliable Loan Company

I am Mrs.Irene Query i was in need of a loan of S$70,000 and was scammed by those fraudulent lenders and a friend introduce me to Dr Purva Pius,and he lend me the loan without any stress,you can contact him at ( Approvals within 2-4 Hours

1. Name Of Applicant in Full:……..
2. Telephone Numbers:……….
3. Address and Location:…….
4. Amount in request………..
5. Repayment Period:………..
6. Purpose Of Loan………….
7. country…………………
8. phone…………………..
9. occupation………………
11.Monthly Income…………..

Email Kindly Contact:

Osman raheem said...

Hello Everybody
My name is Ahmad Asnul Brunei, I contacted Mr Osman Loan Firm for a business loan amount of $250,000, Then i was told about the step of approving my requested loan amount, after taking the risk again because i was so much desperate of setting up a business to my greatest surprise, the loan amount was credited to my bank account within 24 banking hours without any stress of getting my loan. I was surprise because i was first fall a victim of scam! If you are interested of securing any loan amount & you are located in any country, I'll advise you can contact Mr Osman Loan Firm via email

First name......
Middle name.....
2) Gender:.........
3) Loan Amount Needed:.........
4) Loan Duration:.........
5) Country:.........
6) Home Address:.........
7) Mobile Number:.........
8) Email address..........
9) Monthly Income:.....................
10) Occupation:...........................
11)Which site did you here about us.....................
Thanks and Best Regards.
Derek Email